|
Post by doornail on Apr 3, 2012 10:07:05 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by phaedron on Apr 3, 2012 12:29:14 GMT -8
Doornail, this is about as hilarious as it gets. No, I still don't believe the poor black man is more dangerous to me than the rich white man... sorry.
|
|
|
Post by Maximillian Thorton on Apr 3, 2012 12:32:26 GMT -8
Whose more dangerous? The rich white man.
Whose more likely to be violent against you? I'd say the poor black man.
In my VERY humble opinion.
|
|
|
Post by phaedron on Apr 3, 2012 12:34:33 GMT -8
I agree with Max.
But as he alludes to, violence isn't the thing we need to be most worried about -- the systematic erosion of our civil liberties, our purchasing power parity, and our ability to work 40 hours a week or less and still earn a living -- these are far more dangerous in my mind than a dude on the street hopped up on meth or crack.
|
|
|
Post by Maximillian Thorton on Apr 3, 2012 13:16:34 GMT -8
I miss Reagan......
|
|
|
Post by doornail on Apr 3, 2012 15:06:37 GMT -8
what's funny about it is, a certain group made an attempt to start a racial/civil war in this country, and those that immediatly jumped onto the race card fail boat just got played for fools because they didn't check the facts and/or jumped to conclusions.
Zimmerman may have killed an unarmed black kid, but he's not a racist like the black panthers, the media, our pres and others were hoping.
looks like it's back to the drawing board for the three ringed circus that is calling the shots in this country.
|
|
|
Post by doornail on Apr 6, 2012 9:34:54 GMT -8
wow, I was totally wrong about the racial thing being busted wide open, now the U.N. is getting involved. Evedently our Justice system is too flawed to be fair and just according to the U.N. hmm, I wonder why..usually one is innocent until proven guilty, I guess that doesn't apply when blacks are killed? www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5glTo5bY3puIAB-IhMutkFkHLTr_Q?docId=CNG.ece3e53648ded978749d9b29e939c905.7a1 sick of the BS that keeps flowing out of the mouths of the ignorant, lets just get this over with, I'll be ready and I don't miss question I have is if Zimmerman is a white hispanic, does that make slobama a black white or a white black?
|
|
|
Post by Maximillian Thorton on Apr 6, 2012 12:21:50 GMT -8
I'm going to have to agree with you. Innocent till guilty. I don't know what's happened for truth. It's too confusing and too early.
And fuck the UN. 60+ percent of their budget is from us. Human right? I'm glad Syria and Iran are on that council. Hypocrites.
|
|
|
Post by Kippa Tarxien on Apr 6, 2012 13:06:28 GMT -8
And fuck the UN. 60+ percent of their budget is from us. Human right? I get it. 60% of the budget buys you something extra whenever Human Rights issues are involved.
|
|
|
Post by Amarynth on Apr 6, 2012 13:51:54 GMT -8
Since I grew up with the Tawana Brawley case, which is very close to home, (like, literally minutes from me) I just have to say....Sharpton is an ass.
|
|
|
Post by doornail on Apr 6, 2012 14:58:27 GMT -8
you know, this is pretty big news that the U.N. is getting involved in our domestic affairs and casting doubt on our court system..why isn't this all over the news? all I see is "F18 crashes into apartments" as the big headlines, is the jet crash a diversion? Cause I'd bet most people will react negatively to somebody from the UN sticking thier nose in our buisness. Could it have something to do with this? www.theblaze.com/stories/biden-trayvon-martins-death-should-spark-gun-law-debate/do they think that by getting the UN involved, the UN will come in and take our guns? no, that couldn't be it, that's the dumbest idea EVER, lol
|
|
|
Post by Maximillian Thorton on Apr 6, 2012 16:16:33 GMT -8
Of course it doesn't buy us human rights waivers. But they have no room to criticize one of the highest rates nations in regards to human rights. The UN has nations on the HR Council that should never be there. It's utter hypocrisy.
|
|
|
Post by doornail on Apr 6, 2012 17:03:39 GMT -8
Of course it doesn't buy us human rights waivers. But they have no room to criticize one of the highest rates nations in regards to human rights. The UN has nations on the HR Council that should never be there. It's utter hypocrisy. I never looked at it that way, but you're right..the treatment of women in some countries, slave labor, I'm sure there are many more. The race war makes a perfect excuse to allow the UN to police our streets after martial law is declared.
|
|
|
Post by phaedron on Apr 6, 2012 20:05:20 GMT -8
America: We torture people without trials, we use extraordinary rendition to send our captives to countries who do even nastier things, but we will tell you when you are treading on our human rights.
I'm with Kippa.
Taking pot-shots at the U.N. is so 90's. They have no power. They can't make the U.S. do anything. So why do people in the U.S. complain so loudly about them? Distraction?
|
|
|
Post by doornail on Apr 6, 2012 21:52:55 GMT -8
there's more to it than a distraction, why would the UN even care, unless they had prior knowledge of impending riots? like it or not, this is growing bigger by the day with the news media feeding it, the black panthers and now neo-nazi's! blogs.miaminewtimes.com/riptide/2012/04/heavily_armed_neo-nazis_patrol.phpI'm guessing this is the part in the Bible where we kill eachother? nobody is trying to stop it or even denounce the build-up to violence, we've destroyed ourselves by not paying attention to who is running the country. It looks as if we're being forced into a civil war.
|
|